Differbetween
The main difference between the GPL and the LGPL is that the latter allows the work to be linked with (in the case of a library, "used by") a non-(L)GPLed program, regardless of whether it is free software or proprietary software. ... It would fall under the definition of a "work that uses the Library".
- Why is LGPL so bad?
- Can I use LGPL library in commercial software?
- Is LGPL compatible with GPL?
- What LGPL means?
- Can GPL license be used commercially?
- Is LGPL open source?
- Is MIT license free for commercial use?
- How do I use my LGPL license?
- What does copyleft mean?
- Is GPL compatible with Apache?
- What licenses are not compatible with each other?
- Is Apache a copyleft?
Why is LGPL so bad?
License is LGPL. It is a bad idea, for proprietary vendors will not be able to include this software into their systems. It must be non-copyleft. ... It allows proprietary vendors to integrate open-source code directly, without thinking too much.
Can I use LGPL library in commercial software?
3 Answers. In short: yes you can. But one important thing to take care of is that the GNU LGPL covered library is dynamically linked, not statically mixed with the main application. It should also be possible to exchange that dynamically linked library for an independently compiled build.
Is LGPL compatible with GPL?
Note that the LGPL is compatible with the GPL: you can decide to "upgrade" to GPL and incorporate it in a wholly GPL licensed project if you wish. You can't however go the other way and re-license GPL licensed code as LGPL.
What LGPL means?
A Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a license for open-source software that allows for provisions for including elements of free software in either free or proprietary software.
Can GPL license be used commercially?
Software under the GPL may be run for all purposes, including commercial purposes and even as a tool for creating proprietary software, such as when using GPL-licensed compilers. Users or companies who distribute GPL-licensed works (e.g. software), may charge a fee for copies or give them free of charge.
Is LGPL open source?
The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF).
Is MIT license free for commercial use?
Is the MIT license commercial use permissible? MIT licenses allow commercial use. As the MIT license falls in the BSD-style class of licenses, users do not have to provide any other source code when releasing new software.
How do I use my LGPL license?
You mention that it is licensed under the LGPL, with reference to the full license. That you distribute the code, and any changes to it, under the terms of the LGPL. You must release the source code in it's preferred form (not minified or obfuscated), including any changes that you make to it.
What does copyleft mean?
Copyleft is a general method for making a program (or other work) free (in the sense of freedom, not “zero price”), and requiring all modified and extended versions of the program to be free as well. ... So instead of putting GNU software in the public domain, we “copyleft” it.
Is GPL compatible with Apache?
The Apache Software Foundation and the Free Software Foundation agree that the Apache License 2.0 is a free software license, compatible with the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 3, meaning that code under GPLv3 and Apache License 2.0 can be combined, as long as the resulting software is licensed under the ...
What licenses are not compatible with each other?
License compatibility between a copyleft license and another license is often only a one-way compatibility, making the copyleft license (GPL, and most other copyleft licenses) incompatible with proprietary commercial licenses, as well as with many non-proprietary licenses.
Is Apache a copyleft?
Is the Apache considered copyleft? Copyleft licenses require the derivative works or modified versions of existing software to be released under the same license. The Apache License doesn't have any such requirements. It's a permissive license.
