Negotiation

Difference Between Distributive Negotiation and Integrative Negotiation

Difference Between Distributive Negotiation and Integrative Negotiation

Distributive Negotiation is a competitive strategy, whereas integrative negotiation uses a collaborative approach. ... In distributive negotiation, the parties self-interest and individual profit motivate the parties. Unlike, in integrative negotiation mutual interest and gain act as a motivation for the parties involved.

  1. What is distributive negotiation?
  2. What is an integrative negotiation?
  3. What is an example of integrative negotiation?
  4. What are the differences between distributive and integrative bargaining quizlet?
  5. What are the 5 negotiation styles?
  6. What are the characteristics of distributive negotiation?
  7. Why is integrative negotiation difficult?
  8. What makes integrative negotiation different?
  9. What are integrative tactics?
  10. What are the types of negotiation?
  11. What is the back and forth in integrative negotiation?
  12. What are the four major steps in the integrative negotiation process?

What is distributive negotiation?

Distributive Bargaining. Distributive bargaining is a competitive bargaining strategy in which one party gains only if the other party loses something. It is used as a negotiation strategy to distribute fixed resources such as money, resources, assets, etc. between both the parties.

What is an integrative negotiation?

Integrative negotiation is often referred to as “win-win” and typically entails two or more issues to be negotiated. It often involves an agreement process that better integrates the aims and goals of all the involved negotiation participants through creative and collaborative problem-solving.

What is an example of integrative negotiation?

The classic example involves two teenagers and an orange. If there's only one orange in the refrigerator and both teenagers demand it simultaneously, a distributive bargain might well involve each of them getting half of it. ... The integrative bargain is obviously better for both.

What are the differences between distributive and integrative bargaining quizlet?

distributive bargaining: talking down a price to something manageable. Its identifying feature is that it operates under zero-sum conditions—that is, any gain I make is at your expense, and vice versa. integrative bargaining: Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can create a win-win solution.

What are the 5 negotiation styles?

Negotiators have a tendency to negotiate from one of five styles: competing, accommodating, avoiding, compromising, or collaborative.

What are the characteristics of distributive negotiation?

Distributive negotiation is a necessary way of resolving differences between parties with mutually exclusive goals. Parties to the negotiation will withhold as much information as possible to gain an advantage and at the same time, they will try to get as much information from the opposing party as possible.

Why is integrative negotiation difficult?

Integrative negotiation is difficult because you care about the relationship with the other person. Chances are you will continue to work with the other party in the future. ... If you can identify additional issues and share this information in the negotiation, there is a possibility that mutual agreement can be reached.

What makes integrative negotiation different?

Integrative negotiation. In contrast to the distributive negotiation strategy, the integrative negotiation strategy involves a mutually beneficial approach to negotiations, looking for results that are agreeable for all the negotiating parties. This kind of negotiation seeks to create value, rather than claim it.

What are integrative tactics?

Integrative bargaining (also called "interest-based bargaining," "win-win bargaining") is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a "win-win" solution to their dispute. This strategy focuses on developing mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of the disputants.

What are the types of negotiation?

There are various types of negotiation:

What is the back and forth in integrative negotiation?

They define negotiation as “a back and forth communication designed to reach an agreement when you and the other side have some interests that are shared and others that are opposed”.

What are the four major steps in the integrative negotiation process?

There are four major steps in the integrative negotiation process: (1) identify and define the problem, (2) understand the problem and bring interests and needs to the surface, (3) gen- erate alternative solutions to the problem, and (4) evaluate those alternatives and select among them.

Difference Between SMS and MMS
SMS and MMS are two ways to send what we commonly refer to under the umbrella term as text messages. The most simple way to understand the difference ...
Difference Between Modem and Router
Your modem is a box that connects your home network to the wider Internet. A router is a box that lets all of your wired and wireless devices use that...
Difference Between Bleached and Unbleached Flour
Bleached flour has a whiter color, finer grain, and softer texture, while unbleached flour has a denser grain and tougher texture. Bleached flour is t...